Traffic Calming update

Following May’s Parish Council meeting the following email was sent to the B&NES highways department informing them of the Parish Councils decision:

Subject: Re: FW: Traffic Calming Scheme – Station Road, Clutton

Dear Tom 

As you can imagine, the traffic calming proposals were discussed at length at our Parish Council Meeting on Monday Night. 

We had a large turnout of residents with 21 members of public in attendance ( we normally get 2 or 3).  9 of which spoke of their support for the strongest possible measures and recounted anecdotes of near misses and their fear that a serious accident would occur.  A further 9 residents raised their hands to say that they were there as parents and supported the traffic calming measured previously agreed.   No-one spoke against the measures that had previously been agreed.

Following the public participation session the recommendation was put forward, that following the second marginal speed survey and the challenge from one member of public, the Parish Council should amend plans to an option 4 which included strong gateways into the village which would slow the traffic down, a build out/crossing outside the school (especially important now we have lost the school crossing patrol) and a virtual footway as in option 1.  we should also ask for a further speed survey, once the measures were put in place to establish whether further measures would be required.

However in the discussions that followed a number of other councillors spoke to voice their disappointment that option 2, (which had been recommended by B&NES highways officers, and been discussed at length and supported by the Parish Council), was now not being progressed because of a single challenge and that this was not democratic.  The speed surveys were marginal, but as residents we know that cars travel too fast.  The stretch of road should be considered as a specific case as it is used as a cut through from A37-A39, there are no pavements, there are blind corners, the width of the road changes and it is a route to school.  It was also pointed out that the second speed survey was carried out in winter, with darker nights and bad whether, when people were more likely to travel carefully, bringing the average down.

Therefore it was proposed that with the overwhelming backing of the residents the Parish Council put their full weight behind option 2.  This was agreed unanimously.

Kind Regards

Helen Richardson , Clutton Parish Clerk.

Their response was as follows:

Hi Helen,

Thanks for the info gathered from the PC meeting. It is unfortunate that the more conclusive 24h 7day speed data readings didn’t come in sooner (we had an issue with the company involved who went into liquidation after payment was made hence the delay in not receiving the data until February) as my recommendations within the feasibility study would have been slightly different. If you remember the PC were pushing for the report to be presented over Christmas so that you had time to discuss with and lobby the local member (Jeremy Sparks) to find funding for the scheme in 15/16 and the only way this deadline could be met was to use the 1 hour snapshot speed gun survey data already obtained. 

We (as a council) must be seen to be offering a consistent message to all villages that are requesting 20 mph speed limits, therefore the policy has always been;

  • If existing mean average vehicle speeds are under 24mph then a ‘signs only’ speed limit will be permitted.
  • If existing mean average speeds are between 24-26mph then further Engineering solutions would be require before a 20mph speed limit can be implemented. E.g. extra signing and lining, visual road narrowing, additional gateway treatments, flashing VAS signs etc.
  • If existing mean average speeds are above 26mph then traffic calming will be likely required.

I therefore must insist that a hybrid of Option 1 can be the only justifiable scheme that we can pursue at Station Road bearing in mind the mean average speed readings which give a conclusive reading of 24.5mph. The hybrid Option 1 that we will pursue to detailed design will include;

  • Significant 20mph Gateway (to likely include a narrowing + village name sign to include road safety message)
  • Virtual footway throughout Station Road
  • Pedestrian Build out opposite the school (justifiable with loss of School Crossing Patrol)
  • Post implementation Traffic Survey to monitor performance of new speed limit.

I apologise for the confusion this may have caused however we must adhere to the policy that we have set for introducing 20mph schemes in the rural communities otherwise if we don’t we would set a president and other villages would demand the same. Also if challenged it could open the Council up to a judicial review which in turn would then risk the delivery of all 20mph schemes in the rural communities in the short to medium term. 

I believe that the hybrid option 1 will still offer a huge benefit to the local community as well as offer good value for money considering the limited budget, as stated in the original feasibility study. Vehicle speeds will likely be further reduced and pedestrian safety should be greatly improved. I therefore aim to begin the detailed design of this Hybrid Option 1 in June/July and feed this back to the PC and Cllr Warrington before beginning the 20mph speed limit consultation period at the end of July. I will be back in touch with further details once this work has commenced. 

Kind Regards

Tom Hayward, Project Engineer

Bath & North East Somerset Council

The next step will be discussed at the Parish Council meeting on Monday 15th June.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s