Village referendum for Neighbourhood Plan

Clutton Neighbourhood Plan Referendum on 10 September

  • The Neighbourhood Plan has been compiled by a broad cross-section of residents and fully consulted on
  • It has met all the “technical” planning requirements
  • If more than 50% of those voting vote “Yes” it comes into legal force
  • If less than 50% of those voting vote “No” current planning and financial arrangements stay unchanged
  • Anyone who lives in Clutton and is on the Electoral Roll for local government elections can vote
  • If you are not on the Electoral Roll you can apply to Electoral Registration Officer, Electoral Services, Bath & North East Somerset Council, Guildhall, High Street, Bath, BA1 5A, no later than Mon 24th Aug 2015 

Why you should vote

Adopting the Neighbourhood Plan means:

  • Our local priorities and policies have legal effect
  • They have to be reflected in B&NES planning decisions
  • More local control over where development takes place
  • More local control over the type of development
  • More local control over the design of development
  • We can deal with issues not usually covered by larger plans, such as parking
  • More funds (25% 0f the Community Infrastructure Levy paid by all developers) for the Parish Council to spend on improving the village

Not adopting the Neighbourhood Plan means:

  • No change to the current status
  • Only 15% pf the Community Infrastructure Levy to spend on improving the village

Don’t miss this opportunity to help decide how we shape our future.

Printed and published by Clutton Parish Council, 13 Maynard Terrace, Clutton, BS39 5PL

 

Advertisements

Traffic Calming update

Following May’s Parish Council meeting the following email was sent to the B&NES highways department informing them of the Parish Councils decision:

Subject: Re: FW: Traffic Calming Scheme – Station Road, Clutton

Dear Tom 

As you can imagine, the traffic calming proposals were discussed at length at our Parish Council Meeting on Monday Night. 

We had a large turnout of residents with 21 members of public in attendance ( we normally get 2 or 3).  9 of which spoke of their support for the strongest possible measures and recounted anecdotes of near misses and their fear that a serious accident would occur.  A further 9 residents raised their hands to say that they were there as parents and supported the traffic calming measured previously agreed.   No-one spoke against the measures that had previously been agreed.

Following the public participation session the recommendation was put forward, that following the second marginal speed survey and the challenge from one member of public, the Parish Council should amend plans to an option 4 which included strong gateways into the village which would slow the traffic down, a build out/crossing outside the school (especially important now we have lost the school crossing patrol) and a virtual footway as in option 1.  we should also ask for a further speed survey, once the measures were put in place to establish whether further measures would be required.

However in the discussions that followed a number of other councillors spoke to voice their disappointment that option 2, (which had been recommended by B&NES highways officers, and been discussed at length and supported by the Parish Council), was now not being progressed because of a single challenge and that this was not democratic.  The speed surveys were marginal, but as residents we know that cars travel too fast.  The stretch of road should be considered as a specific case as it is used as a cut through from A37-A39, there are no pavements, there are blind corners, the width of the road changes and it is a route to school.  It was also pointed out that the second speed survey was carried out in winter, with darker nights and bad whether, when people were more likely to travel carefully, bringing the average down.

Therefore it was proposed that with the overwhelming backing of the residents the Parish Council put their full weight behind option 2.  This was agreed unanimously.

Kind Regards

Helen Richardson , Clutton Parish Clerk.

Their response was as follows:

Hi Helen,

Thanks for the info gathered from the PC meeting. It is unfortunate that the more conclusive 24h 7day speed data readings didn’t come in sooner (we had an issue with the company involved who went into liquidation after payment was made hence the delay in not receiving the data until February) as my recommendations within the feasibility study would have been slightly different. If you remember the PC were pushing for the report to be presented over Christmas so that you had time to discuss with and lobby the local member (Jeremy Sparks) to find funding for the scheme in 15/16 and the only way this deadline could be met was to use the 1 hour snapshot speed gun survey data already obtained. 

We (as a council) must be seen to be offering a consistent message to all villages that are requesting 20 mph speed limits, therefore the policy has always been;

  • If existing mean average vehicle speeds are under 24mph then a ‘signs only’ speed limit will be permitted.
  • If existing mean average speeds are between 24-26mph then further Engineering solutions would be require before a 20mph speed limit can be implemented. E.g. extra signing and lining, visual road narrowing, additional gateway treatments, flashing VAS signs etc.
  • If existing mean average speeds are above 26mph then traffic calming will be likely required.

I therefore must insist that a hybrid of Option 1 can be the only justifiable scheme that we can pursue at Station Road bearing in mind the mean average speed readings which give a conclusive reading of 24.5mph. The hybrid Option 1 that we will pursue to detailed design will include;

  • Significant 20mph Gateway (to likely include a narrowing + village name sign to include road safety message)
  • Virtual footway throughout Station Road
  • Pedestrian Build out opposite the school (justifiable with loss of School Crossing Patrol)
  • Post implementation Traffic Survey to monitor performance of new speed limit.

I apologise for the confusion this may have caused however we must adhere to the policy that we have set for introducing 20mph schemes in the rural communities otherwise if we don’t we would set a president and other villages would demand the same. Also if challenged it could open the Council up to a judicial review which in turn would then risk the delivery of all 20mph schemes in the rural communities in the short to medium term. 

I believe that the hybrid option 1 will still offer a huge benefit to the local community as well as offer good value for money considering the limited budget, as stated in the original feasibility study. Vehicle speeds will likely be further reduced and pedestrian safety should be greatly improved. I therefore aim to begin the detailed design of this Hybrid Option 1 in June/July and feed this back to the PC and Cllr Warrington before beginning the 20mph speed limit consultation period at the end of July. I will be back in touch with further details once this work has commenced. 

Kind Regards

Tom Hayward, Project Engineer

Bath & North East Somerset Council

The next step will be discussed at the Parish Council meeting on Monday 15th June.

In the news

It has been reported in Thursday’s Somerset Guardian that Curo have decided to sell the field opposite Maynard Terrace as they now realise that the project is not viable and appear to lay the blame with the Parish Council.

http://www.somersetguardian.co.uk/Developers-urged-work-parish-council-Curo-pulls/story-26641742-detail/story.html

Here is the full statement from the Parish Council which has now been sent to the Somerset Guardian:

‘We were not surprised to hear of Curo’s decision to not pursue their proposed development in the field opposite Maynard Terrace.  We are well aware of the challenging site they had chosen, and over the years have seen other developers assess the field and walk away because of its unsuitability and because of the costs associated with this location.

Public opinion was overwhelmingly against the development with 185 letters from  local people objecting to it, for many valid reasons and no letters in support. 66% of the addresses were from within Clutton excluding Maynard Terrace, this clearly shows that we are representing the majority of the village.  Additionally 73 people came to the Parish Council meeting at which this was discussed and only 1 person spoke in support, so it was clearly our duty to put their views forward in our consultation reply.

As a Parish Council we have tried to work with Curo – at our request there have been two meeting with them on the 22nd May 2014 and 4th Feb 2015, at which we discussed the problems  and put forward suggestions for alternative layouts/build details, some of which would have resulted in long term savings for the ongoing maintenance of their properties. Both these meetings were minuted and copies sent to the planning cases officers involved. At no time did Curo indicate that the sort of improvements we were suggesting in order to comply with planning guidance and best practice would cause difficulties in terms of the viability of the scheme.

It should have been clear to Curo, as developers, from the start that the site would prove to be expensive to build on. Anyone, even someone without experience in development, can see by looking at the site, and at Ordnance Survey maps, that the site slopes steeply with deep undulations. Maps of the geology, available from Ordnance Survey and on line from the Coal Authority, show that 3 coal seams outcrop in the development area, and that additionally there is one mine shaft and several bell pits on the site.  All of these can be remediated, but at a cost. As developers they must surely have known this and factored it in before they purchased the land.

Outline permission having been granted, the Parish Council, representing residents, took the view that it should work constructively to secure the best possible design and layout. The fact that the scheme brought forward by Curo bore so little resemblance to the original proposals, either in appearance or quality, was entirely Curo’s decision and can only reflect a failure to listen to residents and accurately assess the real costs of developing this awkward site to an acceptable standard in the first place. The Parish Council’s formal objections to the detailed application are all carefully based on planning best practice and adherence to important B&NES planning policies.

We support the provision of affordable housing in the right location and would urge any developer wanting to build in Clutton, to work with the Parish Council to identify a site and scheme that would benefit local people and which could be supported by the local community.

Clutton road safety scheme unveiled to residents

Villagers will be able to find out more about a new road safety scheme for Clutton at the Annual Village Meeting on Monday 20th April.

The traffic calming measures, which have been drawn up by Bath and North East Somerset Council, will create safer walking routes through the village for schoolchildren and other pedestrians.

They include new footways protected by build-outs to slow motorists, give way stop points and a safe crossing area outside the school. Once these measures are in place Clutton will become eligible for a 20 mph speed limit.

The traffic calming measures have been drawn up following concerns from local residents, Clutton Primary School and the parish council about motorists speeding through the village.

The likely increase in construction traffic to service the planned housing developments in Maynard Terrace and at the Clovelly site have given the scheme added urgency.

A total of £30,000 has been made available by B&NES to fund the scheme which will also be supplemented by contributions from housing developers worth thousands of pounds.

Residents will be able to view the  plans and speak to members of the Parish Council at the Annual Village Meeting at 7PM on Monday, alternatively you can view the plans electronically below and send comments to clerk@clutton.org.uk or in writing to Clutton Parish Council, PO box 1287, Clutton, BS39 5XX.

We particularly want you to consider the plans in relation to your property and raise any issues that the highways officers may not have considered, using your local knowledge.

11 Clutton_Station_Road-Sht 2-1

51 Clutton_Station_Road

52 Clutton_Station_Road

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT A FORMAL CONSULTATION.

Parish Council Elections

If you would be interested becoming a Parish Councillor, please see the following information.

NOTICE OF ELECTION

Clutton Parish Council

Election of Councillors

Parish Council Number of Councillors to be elected
Clutton Parish Council 13
  1. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Returning Officer, Council Chamber, Guildhall, High Street, Bath, BA1 5AW, on any day after the date of this notice, on Monday to Friday 10am to 4pm (excluding bank holidays) but no later than 4pm on Thursday 9 April 2015.
  2. Nomination papers may be obtained from the offices of the Returning Officer, Guildhall, High Street, Bath, BA1 5AW, during the times stated above, or alternatively from the Parish Clerk at the address below.
    1. If the election is contested the poll will take place on Thursday 7 May 2015.
  3. Applications to register to vote must reach the Electoral Registration Officer by midnight on Monday 20 April 2015.
  4. Applications, amendments or cancellations of postal votes must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at the Guildhall, High Street, Bath, BA1 5AW, by 5pm on Tuesday 21 April 2015.
  5. Applications to vote by proxy at this election must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at the Guildhall, High Street, Bath, BA1 5AW, by 5pm on Tuesday 28 April 2015.
  6. Applications to vote by emergency proxy at this election on the grounds of physical incapacity or for work/service reasons must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at the Guildhall, High Street, Bath, BA1 5AW, by 5pm on Thursday 7 May 2015.

The physical incapacity must have occurred after 5pm on Tuesday 28 April 2015.

To apply on the grounds of work/service, the person must have become aware that they cannot go to the polling station in person after 5pm on Tuesday 28 April 2015.

Returning Officer           Vernon Hitchman

Dated                           Wednesday 25 March 2015

Parish Clerk’s contact details for nomination papers:

Helen Richardson

PO Box 1287

Clutton

BS39 5XX

07542 689 398

clerk@clutton.org.uk

 

Recruitment of School Crossing Patrols

Bath and North East Somerset Council are looking for community minded people to work in a very rewarding community role of school crossing patrol.  If you would like to work outdoors, meet lots of people why not join the School Crossing Patrol Service?

Apply now to join one of our many school crossing patrol sites and provide an invaluable service to your community helping our children and adults walk to school.  Alternatively, become a Casual School Crossing Patrol and be on call to support/cover our permanent Patrols in one or more school locations.

Salary: £13,715 – £14,075 pa, pro rata. The current pay rate is £7.11 – 7.29 per hour plus holiday pay and paid sickness, term time of 38 weeks per year.  Job share applicants are welcome.  Uniform and full training are provided.

You will need to be punctual, reliable and in line with the Council policy all successful applicants will be subject to medical and DBS clearance. You will also need good communication skills with both children and adults.  With the flexibility of morning and/or afternoon shifts being available, we currently have permanent patrol vacancies at the following schools:

  • Chandag Junior School, Keynsham (8:25 – 9:00 and 15:00 – 15:40 = 6:15 hours per week)
  • Midsomer Norton Primary (8:25 – 8:55 and 15:00 – 15:35 = 5:25 hours per week)
  • St Andrew’s CofE Primary School (8:30 – 9:10 and 15:10 – 15:40 = 5:50 hours per week)
  • St Stephens Primary School (8:15 – 9:00 and 15:10 – 15:45 = 6:40 hours per week)
  • Weston All Saints Primary School (8:25 – 9:00 and 15:15 – 15:45 = 5:50 hours per week)
  • Whitchurch Primary School (8:30 – 9:05 and 15:10 –15:45 = 6:40 hours per week)

For an application pack contact www.bathnes.gov.uk: or tel: 01225 396409, or Email: people_services @bathnes.gov.uk.

To apply for a permanent position of School Crossing Patrol, quote advert (ref: 13-50900).

To apply for a position of Casual School Crossing Patrol quote advert (ref: 13-50901).

 

Extraordinary Parish Council meeting

An extraordinary Parish Council meeting has been organised to discuss the planning application for parcel 0006 Maynard Terrace 14/05692/RES.  This will be held on Saturday 7th February at 10am in the Village Hall.  All residents are welcome to give their comments before the Parish Council decide on their response.

However, please be aware that this development was agreed in principle in the outline planning application. This Reserved Matters Application will only address certain aspects of the development as described below.

Please note that the means of access arrangements were approved in the appeal for the outline application and so in this instance will not be considered in the Reserved Matters application.

A guide to reserved matters applications follows:

Guidance Notes for:

Application for Approval of Reserved Matters following Outline Approval

Article 21 Town & Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995

The Application for Approval of Reserved Matters form should be used after an outline planning application has been approved.

A reserved matters application deals with some or all of the outstanding details of the outline application proposal, including:

appearance – aspects of a building or place which affect the way it looks, including the exterior of the development

means of access – covers accessibility for all routes to and within the site, as well as the way they link up to other roads and pathways outside the site *** (Please note that in the Maynard Terrace outline application, this has already been agreed subject to technical approval and so will not be considered at the Reserved Matters stage)***

landscaping – the improvement or protection of the amenities of the site and the area and the surrounding area, this could include planting trees or hedges as a screen

layout – includes buildings, routes and open spaces within the development and the way they are laid out in relations to buildings and spaces outside the development

scale – includes information on the size of the development, including the height, width and length of each proposed building

The details of the reserved matters application must be in line with the outline approval, including any conditions attached to the permission. If your proposals have changed in any way, you may need to reapply for outline or full planning permission.

Some, though not all, details may have been formally submitted and approved at the outline application stage, if the applicant chose to do so, or the council insisted.

The outline decision notice, issued by the council, will state which matters were reserved for later approval.

Permission lasts for two years from the last date that the reserved matters were approved, or, three years from the date that outline planning permission was approved – whichever date is the later.